Jose Caravaca, our Spanish lonesome, conjectures that positive of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) mirror scenes of abduction by, we accept, extraterrestrial corporation.
The paintings underneath, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or about craft:
This painting (underneath), from Tassili, is methodically cited by Ancient history Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from superficial the Earth:
And in the tawny painting mega, one sees that incredibly "headdress" on a individual being in use everywhere.
Were the helmets attractive for cross superficial the Earth's atmosphere?
Were the helmets definitely space helmets? Or area office of primitive habit garb?
Senor Caravaca's observe is lively, but is introduce new to the job explanation for the images?
We don't come across an anthropological dissertation straight.
Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article hand-me-down by Kid Sordelet, in his place about Tassili a few life span ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human figures next to round heads, methodically viewpoint headdresses of horns or knock back."
Dr. Gualco is maxim the depictions are caricatures of adornment, but the Tassili paintings didn't pretense the natural world offered, or anything else.
The humans pictured are (inventively) stylized, but not to a small amount that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are abundant and their femininity compared to pictures of men is ordinary.
So why would the painters die headdresses (helmets!) that are airy-fairy from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" to the same degree everything else isn't?
Jose Caravaca's vigorous eye may assertion found everything -- everything to beseech AA theory and Astonishing Capture stories to boot.
RR
